cornerofmadness: (Default)
[personal profile] cornerofmadness
I’ve been thinking a lot about The Hunger Games. Honestly, I wasn’t all that impressed with the book. It’s pretty much Battle Royale and The Running Man with a cute girl lead. However, the one thing that makes me cheer it on is that it IS a girl lead. Another moment of honesty, I don’t get that worked up if there are mostly male characters in a story. I DO get upset if the girl is only there to weep, wail and get captured every moment.

When it comes down to it, I’d rather the tweens get excited by a strong girl like Katniss than Bella. But it did get me thinking about my own writing. I’m more comfortable writing men. I do not know why. I just am. Even when I start out writing a female lead eventually a male lead crops up and takes over. The closest I’ve come is Splinters of Silver and Cold Iron with Tazia Dragonetti and Machiavelli Moon with Maddelena (who is an older female well at least in vampire years).

I think some of my unhappiness with the female lead stems from childhood where we often didn’t see any or the ones we did see were rather bitchy. I’ve always found C.J. Cherryh’s females to be more bitch than strong though the Nebulas and Hugos she’s been lauded with don’t seem to mind.

The other day two challenges came to mind, one fannish and one original. Granted, it would be a hard challenge to do so I will put it out there more as a request, I’d love to see some of my friends try doing a strong female lead (YA or otherwise). If you’re doing it, I’d be interested in seeing the result.

Also I thought this might be of interest. I got it from my author’s list. It discusses when and how to use social media to promote your latest work. When to use social media to promote your work


Total word count –

22511 / 75000 words. 30% done!

Kept Tear –

13420 / 17000 words. 79% done! (yes I shifted the word count up)

Geeklove – currently abandoned because of deadline issues and work. I’ll come back to it later sadly

Machiavelli Moon – unedited

Splinters & Until the Ice Breaks – ditto

Riding with Strangers – got a scene done. Imagine that!

All my help this charity stories are in limbo STILL. I am SO sorry.

Date: 2012-03-25 07:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] marlex.livejournal.com
I'm amused because I read this on my phone while sitting in the movie theater waiting for The Hunger Games to start. Figured I'd reply while I wait.

I agree Battle Royale is better literature but Hunger Games was a fun.

I have to pause here because some teen girl is getting embarassed as hell after her mom convinced the rest of those waiting here to sing Happy Birthday.

Ok... I look at Katniss as being the anti-Bella. She has no real interest in romance and just concerned with survival. Obviously its a product of her life to that point but I agree it was nice to see a strong young female character taking such a proactive role.

As for works I read I've never been bothered by reading books with female protagonists. Young Wizards come to mine and Muriel of Redwall.

As for writing I'm fine writing either.

Date: 2012-03-25 07:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cornerofmadness.livejournal.com
okay that IS funny.

And I agree that Katniss is definitely the anti-Bella and thank god for it. I had problems with the world building in it (and the physiology but the average reader isn't going to know that)

I STILL need to read Young Wizards

Date: 2012-03-25 07:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] marlex.livejournal.com
Agree again with the world-building. I have to say I was surprised by the level of violence in a YA book. I don't mind but after all the chatter over Harry Potter I'm surprise (but not disappointed) there wasn't more of a backlash.

Oh... yes you should read YW. If you like female protagonists you'll like Nita.

Date: 2012-03-25 08:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cornerofmadness.livejournal.com
Yes there is a huge amount of violence. I just started Prince of Thorns and holy hell, it starts off with a murder spree by the former prince who is 13. Technically libraries would have to house that with Percy Jackson and Harry Potter due to the age of the protagonist.

I need to make myself a note for YW

Date: 2012-03-26 02:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] marlex.livejournal.com
Well... home from the movie. It was well done. Considering so much of the book is about Katniss' inner conflicts, I felt they did a good job translated that to the screen.

Date: 2012-03-26 03:08 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cornerofmadness.livejournal.com
well that's good because I had wondered about that

Date: 2012-03-26 02:57 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ashes1753.livejournal.com
I can't really comment on The Hunger Games yet as i haven't read/seen it yet, but i always do like a good heroine. She doesn't necassarily have to be a fighter, but if she's smart, knows what she want's and doesn't take no crap then that's ok.

Bella, from Twilight i see as one of the worst characters in my opinion, she just doesn't have anything going for her, seeing you describe Katniss as being anti-Bella makes me a little excited about actually reading/seeing this.

And i always use Buffy Summers as the benchmark. LOL

As for writing, it's not a matter of gender for me, it's a matter of the actual characteristics. :)

Date: 2012-03-26 05:02 pm (UTC)
ext_15252: (don't fuk)
From: [identity profile] masqthephlsphr.livejournal.com
I always have female leads as protagonists, antagonists, and supporting characters. But I have male supporting characters as well. I'm not uncomfortable writing a male lead, as I did with Connor in The Destroyer, I just find I naturally start writing female characters. And even when I was writing TD with Connor as the lead, he was still the sidekick to a strong female.

I don't remember as a kid noticing that the girl/woman characters were any less prevalent or poorly presented relative to the male characters, but I am pretty sure I self-screened for that without even noticing. I'd just get bored of those stories and stop reading them without absorbing why.

Date: 2012-03-26 05:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cornerofmadness.livejournal.com
I would think that most women would find writing female leads as natural and yet that isn't always the case which I find interesting. I wrote them more when I was younger and have wondered if me being in traditionally male jobs had an affect on that

There weren't that many when we were young and now I hear people complaining about fantasy getting too 'girlie.' now THAT irritates me

Date: 2012-03-26 05:48 pm (UTC)
ext_15252: (kehleyr)
From: [identity profile] masqthephlsphr.livejournal.com
Most of the women I know write male leads, but then, most of the women writers I know are fan fic writers on LJ/DW.

That frustrates the hell out me, not knowing many female writers who are naturally drawn to female characters.

Date: 2012-03-26 05:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cornerofmadness.livejournal.com
interesting and yes I can see why that's a problem. I love a strong female lead, Buffy, Scully, your icon etc. i want to create one which is where my frustration is coming from

Date: 2012-03-26 06:19 pm (UTC)
ext_15252: (Default)
From: [identity profile] masqthephlsphr.livejournal.com
My worry is no one will want to read my new story, which is sci-fi/fantasy, because the two main characters are both women and over thirty.

Date: 2012-03-27 03:19 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cornerofmadness.livejournal.com
honestly I can see why you would be. Then again more women than ever are reading genre fiction (though a huge chunk of those are teens)

Date: 2012-03-27 03:42 am (UTC)
ext_15252: (Default)
From: [identity profile] masqthephlsphr.livejournal.com
I'd assume women would read it. But will men?

Date: 2012-03-27 03:48 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cornerofmadness.livejournal.com
they love the Honor Harrington stuff so probably

Date: 2012-03-27 03:57 am (UTC)
ext_15252: (Default)
From: [identity profile] masqthephlsphr.livejournal.com
I wonder what the Once Upon a Time viewer demographics are like.

Date: 2012-03-27 04:03 am (UTC)

Date: 2012-03-27 08:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] likeadeuce.livejournal.com
Aren't women most of the book-buying market, though, at least for fiction? Do you NEED men to read your story for it to be a success?

Date: 2012-03-27 08:30 pm (UTC)
ext_15252: (Default)
From: [identity profile] masqthephlsphr.livejournal.com
No, but I don't want my story to get pegged as "women's fiction", either.

Date: 2012-03-27 08:36 pm (UTC)
ext_15252: (Default)
From: [identity profile] masqthephlsphr.livejournal.com
Because it brings a lot of unfair prejudices to people's minds. My writing, for example, is pretty low on romantic elements that people, fairly or unfairly, associate with the label "women's fiction." On the other hand, there is a strong emphasis on family relationships, which is also associated with women's fiction.

I would hope they would just see it as a cool sci-fi/urban fantasy story and not pre-judge what the content is upfront and pass it over for that reason.

Date: 2012-03-27 08:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] likeadeuce.livejournal.com
That does sound like a tricky marketing issue.

On the other hand, you're not going to get every reader, and with the female reading audience being a pretty significant one, what's the value in sweating the audience you might be losing to 'girl cooties'?

That's not a rhetorical question; I think 'how much ground do we give to other people's prejudices'/ how much do we let it compromise our work is a legitimate issue!

Date: 2012-03-27 08:56 pm (UTC)
ext_15252: (Default)
From: [identity profile] masqthephlsphr.livejournal.com
Well, so far it hasn't compromised my work, because I write about what I want to write about. I write about it and worry that it might get unfairly pigeon-holed. I don't think that's irrational.

Date: 2012-03-27 09:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] likeadeuce.livejournal.com
To me it seems the only response is to fight that dismissiveness, by doing good work and doing what you can to get an accurate picture of it out there.

Date: 2012-03-27 09:08 pm (UTC)
ext_15252: (bang)
From: [identity profile] masqthephlsphr.livejournal.com
Alas, writers must become marketers. It sucks, but it's true.

Date: 2012-03-28 01:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cornerofmadness.livejournal.com
I'm with you on this point. It not only sucks. It is also hard

Date: 2012-03-28 02:10 am (UTC)
ext_15252: (Default)
From: [identity profile] masqthephlsphr.livejournal.com
It's just not the same skill set at ALL.

Date: 2012-03-28 02:20 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cornerofmadness.livejournal.com
no and traditionally that's what that huge precentage to the publisher was supposed to cover. That bothers me more than a bit

Date: 2012-03-28 01:41 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cornerofmadness.livejournal.com
In SF, men are the primary driving force but that is changing getting closer to 50/50. Any other genre and I wouldn't worry too much

Date: 2012-03-26 07:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] spiderling.livejournal.com
I was, as a child, very conscious of the lack of good female protagonists in books and on TV. I was frustrated that a girl couldn't save the world. And even as a kid when we had writing prompts in school I would consciously write strong female protagonists often bettering or triumphing over male characters.

And it remains with me today. I like writing strong women and I do so consciously. 90% of my stories have female leads and I like that. I do occasionally write male POVs but only if the character is interesting or needs to be male. I have one short story on submission with a male doctor lead and a failed MG with a boy protag (who I liked a lot).

AND OMG! I should asked you to beta my short with the doctor! I'm sure I got piles wrong! And he didn't have as much as personality as I wanted...

Date: 2012-03-27 03:18 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cornerofmadness.livejournal.com
that's very interesting. Even growing up I didn't care that much BUT then again I balanced the fantasy with tons of mysteries which were female heavy so that might have been it.

It's very coo l that you're writing female heavy stories and yes you could have done that with that story

Date: 2012-03-26 08:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] likeadeuce.livejournal.com
I'm curious, does the divide between male and female leads in your writing differ much if you're writing original fiction vs. fanfic? Does it matter if it's a relationship/erotica story vs. a gen story?

Date: 2012-03-27 02:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cornerofmadness.livejournal.com
I set this aside for a while to think on it because those are excellent questions that I had no easy answer to.

At one time, I wrote more females for both original and fanfic. In the 80's - mid -90's I wrote mostly female characters. Then in the 90's, I started my residency and medical practice. I think this is about when I started switching my focus. Maybe it was because I was in a more traditional male job and most of my coworkers were men. I don't know

But now I do tend to write males slightly more in fanfic (and definitely more in original). I'm still drawn to the strong female. I did love Buffy and Willow but I found Spike (and Dru) and Giles easier to write. I didn't really like that many of the women in Angel other than Kate and Lilah but I did find Angel, Wes and Connor easier to write (Gunn and Lorne less so)

I love Riza, Olivia Ran Fan and Winry, all strong women but I do end up writing about them not alone and almost always with their male compatriot. I find Roy easier to write than Riza.

Some of my fandoms barely even have women in them (Saiyuki, Dogs: Bullets & Carnage, Black Butler)

So I guess the answer is no, both fanfic and original have a male bias and that's regardless of if I'm doing shippy stuff or general. I'm trying to remember a general story that I've written from a female pov. I know I DO have them but they aren't coming to mind.

Date: 2012-03-27 03:56 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] likeadeuce.livejournal.com
Looking over this discussion, I'm wondering what it is you're aiming to get out of it? Does Hunger Games make you want to write more female point-of-view stories, or are you happy with the viewpoints you've written and are just idly wondering why you've made those choices? Because I think those are different conversations. And if you have a 'male bias' because there's something about masculinity that you are interested in exploring, that's different from having the same bias because you think girls are dumb and gross (which of course you aren't saying but actually DOES seem to be a factor for some, so I'm not just making a crazy hypothetical) -- and there are a lot of degrees in between.

I am interested in this idea about 'strong women'. I see that term a lot without understanding exactly what people mean by it (and I think people use it to mean different things.) It seems like you are most interested in writing about women who you classify as 'strong.' Do you also prefer the men you write about to be strong? Is it strength that you have a bias toward, or is the point to avoid a particular type of female behavior, and "strong" means "not that kind of behavior"?

Could any of the male protagonists you've written by changed to be women or would it fundamentally alter them? It's interesting that we're talking about this in relation to FMA, because I've had several conversations about how Edward Elric could have been 'Emily Elric' and the story wouldn't fundamentally change at all. Do you agree with that, or is there something I'm missing that says Ed *needs* to be a boy?

Is that question making any sense?

Date: 2012-03-27 04:15 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cornerofmadness.livejournal.com
THe answer to the first question is both. I am happy with the stories I've written but things like Buffy and Hunger Games make me want to write more female oriented things.

And I am wondering why I'm more drawn to the male characters not being male myself.

For me strong means capable, intelligent, independent. As opposed to serving little purpose in the story other than to be the love interest who gets captured every five minutes because she's made a stupid move. The typical princess who'd be nothing without her prince charming.

Often times my men aren't that strong. They are often damaged physically or mentally (but that's a whole other topic) but even with that, they have strength of character.

Sometime I see women either written as clingy and helpless (romance genre used to be very good for this but I understand that's changing) or snappish and bitchy and that was considered 'strong' That doesn't fit my definition.

Honestly, no, I don't think I could interchange the sex of any of my characters, or at least I hope not. I do think men and women think about things differently. Our brains aren't even wired the same and cultural expectations are often very different, obviously.

That is interesting. I guess in theory Ed could have been female. There is nothing really that demands him being male but to me his world view and attitudes are more distinctly male. I couldn't imagine him as female (though I know that doesn't stop fanfic authors, I see Girl!Ed stories all over. I haven't really ever read them)

Date: 2012-03-27 04:26 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] likeadeuce.livejournal.com
Let me try phrasing the question a different way -- I don't mean to imply that you should be able to just switch the gender pronouns in a story and have it make no difference. But at some point in the developing of a story, it seems that a writer must be saying, "I want to write a protagonist who is in X situation, or who is facing Y conflict." At that point in forming the story, it seems like the character could be male or female. What is the point at which something tells you what the gender of the character should be to best serve the story?

If it's a conscious choice to write about a man, why that choice? If it's a default that you go to, are there tweaks you can make to change up those defaults?

Or do you think that to write more about women, you'd need to write about a fundamentally different type of character than you've written?
Edited Date: 2012-03-27 04:26 am (UTC)

Date: 2012-03-27 03:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cornerofmadness.livejournal.com
okay yes, I should have probably guessed that (but it was after midnight and my brain was shutting down).

I don't really plot out stories the way you're suggesting. I know people who outline everything before they begin but I'm more on Stephen King's track of 'letting it spin.' I'm character driven. I almost always know the characters first then craft the story around them so I take them as my mind comes up with them. I can only remember once in recent times have I thought this character would work better as this sex and only because it fit an open call to an anthology (I could see the story working either way so i went with what was paying)

So I guess it's almost a subconscious choice most of the time. I think about the characters and my brain picks which to write about. I almost always have female and male characters in equal measures (barring the m/m erotica of course). They start out on equal footing but somewhere along the road I almost always hear the male voices stronger.

I think I need to identify why that shift in focus occurs rather than it being a fundamental difference in the type of c haracter.

Date: 2012-03-27 05:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] likeadeuce.livejournal.com
Let me suggest something that I think could be going on. I may be totally off base and I'm not familiar enough with your writing to know whether it applies there, but based on what I'm getting from your meta --

It seems like you have a higher (or at least different) standard of behavior for women than for men. You want the female characters to be strong, however you define strength, and if they aren't strong you find them less interesting. Also, if their 'strong' behavior manifests in unpleasant ways, you find that a turnoff.

If the above is true, which your meta suggests, you may be restricting your female characters' freedom to act. They don't have as much of a range to make choices -- to try things and fail -- as the men do, because in your head they don't just stand for themselves as individuals but for 'women.' Therefore, writing those characters feels more restrictive, therefore you have more creative freedom with the men.

Using Riza as an example, since she's come up a few times and since I've spent the last six months writing and thinking about her -- she often gets name-checked as a 'strong' character, but IMHO some of her most interesting moments are ones where she comes across as submissive, or when she literally bursts into tears and loses her shit during a firefight. I don't think either of these things keeps her from qualifying as a strong character, or a strong person, but if they were just on an abstract checklist of character traits, I think most writers would hesitate to assign them to a 'strong' character. And since I don't see a lot of fic or meta focusing on these aspects of her, I'm not sure if people who think she's a strong character just think these are embarrassing incidents to ignore and file away and pretend didn't happen, or if they are uncomfortable exploring these aspects of her because they don't fit the 'strong character' mode.

The thought process in the above paragraph has a lot to do with why I wrote the Big Bang stories that I did, but even then I was constantly terrified that I was writing her as too unlikeable -- and honestly, if I didn't perceive the character as being extremely popular (if under-examined) in the fandom, I don't think I could have brought myself to write and post it.

Date: 2012-03-27 07:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cornerofmadness.livejournal.com
that is very interesting. I'm not really sure if it's accurate or not since I'm currently blind to what's going on in my mind with this. But it is interesting.

I think that Riza losing her shit was perhaps some of her most human moments and I agree do not make her less strong. I find it made her more believable. I think if she were more icy like Olivia I would find it less believable (or at least more sociopathetic)

thanks. this has been a really interesting discussion

Date: 2012-03-27 08:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] likeadeuce.livejournal.com
Thanks for the food for thought, and for giving me a chance to articulate some things. I'll be interested to see if any future projects grow out of this, for you.

Date: 2012-03-28 01:40 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cornerofmadness.livejournal.com
Cool. I've started laying the groundwork in my head for the fantasy story. I won' have time for it just this second but I'm noodling it around. Maybe when I get my next [livejournal.com profile] origfic_bingo card I'll try doing one for it

Profile

cornerofmadness: (Default)
cornerofmadness

May 2025

S M T W T F S
     1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 30th, 2025 01:24 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
OSZAR »